To exaggerate the immanence of Falasteenistan it would be as dangerous as to completely ignore it. It would contribute to the enemy propaganda campaign that aims to portray the resistance as unrepresentative of the will of the Palestinian masses, and would also draw the resistance into a battle for which it is currently ill-equipped; ignoring it would prevent us from preparing for the inevitable confrontation.
— Read on fikra-magazine.com/

In the present balance of forces in the class struggle we find a split social movement, perhaps best symbolized by this present excitement over, yet again, a Democratic Party nominee promising reforms from a municipal executive office, and how it stands in tactical opposition to the uprising against the deportation regime’s military occupation of Los Angeles by the proletarians of that region. The geographical distance of these two political moments mirrors the practical separation of these strategies, and the lack of any organized coordination between partisans on these fronts. Such a distance provokes us to evaluate this situation and identify where indeed the real movement of communism resides, and to further develop the critique of bourgeois democracy and the state in these institutions’ relation to the emergent revolutionary proletariat.
— Read on www.negationmag.com/articles/public-safety-self-defense

Conventional definitions of American post-war ‘hegemony’ have focused on the sheer preponderance of economic and military power concerted through an atomic-military monopoly, monetary sovereignty, overseas investment, and historic differentials of productivity and mass consumption. Accordingly, from a baseline in the late 1940s when the conjunction of all these . . .
— Read on newleftreview.org/issues/i143/articles/mike-davis-the-political-economy-of-late-imperial-america